Early last quarter I accidentally missed a class and nobody realized that I was gone. I was somewhat devastated. (You can read about it here.) So, I made a mission of trying to send a text message to people when I noticed that they weren't in class. Initially, I asked people if they needed soup.
The implication was that they might need soup in order to get over the illness they were pretending to have to not go to class. At first it was kind of funny. It was eventually shortened to an MMS that read "Dude...do you need soup?" And the "dude" applied indiscriminately to males and females alike. With time, it became one of my catchphrases, along with "crazy cakes," "I need some booty-shaking tunes," and "You're probably right." (The last was attributed to me, but I still contest that it's properly termed a "catchphrase.") While it was fun for a time, I feel like the expression has become trite.
The problem is that those who receive the message are frequently "repeat receivers." They have little interest in a constant barrage of inquiry about the status of their soup necessity. The repetition wears people down. The sentiment loses its flavor. The yummy morsels of quirkiness and care become trite and bland.
The lack of response I get from these text messages further compounds need for a minor revolution is further compounded by the lack of response that I get to the text messages. When that happens, I feel like the texts just linger on the telephone waves and on the minds of the readers. It makes me feel awkward. It's clear then, that I need to solve this problem, but I'm not sure where to start.
Having rooted the entire phenomenon in "soup," it seems like there is a means for a natural evolution. For example the standard "Dude...do you need soup?" text message could simply become: "Soup?" The difference is that the course of prior dealings has constructed a context that conveys the message absent the otherwise-necessary subject and verb. Similarly, I thought about using specific types of soup also followed by a question mark: Ex: "Vichyssoise?"; "Gazpacho?"; "Tomato bisque?"; etc. However, I feel like this step may move the textual exchange from the realm of an inside joke to the kingdom of the esoteric.
Alternatively, I thought of building on the pretense. That is, I know you're not really sick, but I'll play along anyway. A sample text message under that theory may be: "Do you need some aspirin?"; "Do you have enough motrin?"; "What did the doctor say?" Here again lies another issue: raising medical questions flies in the face of the jocular tone of the "soup" interrogative. Soup is kind of funny. People rarely get upset about soup. A proffer of soup is usually warmly received (even in the case of gazpacho...which is a cold soup...the joke is about "warm" and "cold" in the context of soup...esoteric point proven!) even if made in jest. Further, people don't usually demand soup once it's offered. Although, I should note, if anyone had demanded performance, I was ready to make a variety of soups to fulfill the promise.
Finally, it may be a serious contender to eliminate the texties altogether. This would avoid the angst of what to say, but also contradicts the goal at the inception.
What do you suggest? Does this discussion of soup make you as hungry as it did me?






Recent Comments